Moral Quandary of Race Essay

In his give-and-take, I am non a Racist, preciselyThe righteous Quandary of Race, Lawrence A. Blum, a professor of Philosophy and Liberal Arts, ventures into unacknowledged and little known aspects of racism. His definition and analysis of racism and its implications, projects the vastness of the subject, which had more often than non been regarded as just a white side. Blum describes racism as distaste towards individuals of a racialized group, stemming from inferiorization or the idea that the group is inferior in notification to other groups.Blum considers a person to be a anti-Semite(a) further when he intentionally makes racist comments or jokes, driven by racial antipathy. He feels that the moral significance of the term racism seems to be losing its value, as it is being over apply or too vulgarly used. Today, in practical life, every direct or indirect references which affect feelings of racial groups ar considered racist. This not but dilutes the very meaning of racism that also weakens its position of ethical condemnation. The develop racism and its related terminology needs to be more clear, due to its relevance in personal racism, racist, racist beliefs at various levels.The author feels the term racism is being more used out of context, like shadowy students intending to sit with other black students for lunch or white teacher being uncomfortable talking with the black parents, which are all regarded as racism. The obligate also emphasizes the need to overcompensate race-based statistical data with greater care and concern as they work individual perceptions. The statistical differences among the views of racial groups must be projected without every overracialization (p35). Overstating the differences of such views would only reinforce A book review 3an individuals racist opinion and close them to persuading arguments or reasonable conversation. Opposing the general notion that racial groups begin a common agenda with rega rd to their group, Blum emphasizes the need to recognize the existence of internal alteration within social groups. Racial groups with a sizable population cannot have a single opinion or viewpoint. Several factors including age, gender, religion, culture etc. influence the formation of a viewpoint of an individual (p55). Blum therefore attributes it to misrecognition or inadequate recognition rising from ignorance, when any single viewpoint is attributed to an wide-cut race.Although Blum feels that whites should not forget their relevance and association with racism, he adds that racism is not confined only to the whites. For instance Chinese, Japanese, and blacks too exhibit racist attitude to other colored people and whites. The belief of their racial superiority is actual by colored people, which makes them regard other groups inferior (p33). In this book, Blum indicates our hypersensitivity to the word racism and suggests that racist insensitivity and subconscious racial in tolerance are indeed acts, which need to be eliminated, but need not be tagged as racist.Blum is of the opinion that racial prejudice is an required consequence of cultural kind. Our view and way of life today is associated with racist ideologies, which we have inherited. The concept of race had developed from the sixteenth century, A book view 4 reaching its peak in the late ordinal century. History holds the key for our present interpretation on human diversity in terms of similarity, differences and superiority among races (p109).Blum explores the idea of doing away with the concept of race, but warns that it should be only after all associated wrongdoings are fully addressed. The book covers all vital aspects of racism including its history and, what we actually mean and conceive of of race. It incorporates much useful information on the topic, carefully thought and reasoned, illustrated by suitable examples. I am not a Racist, ButThe Moral Quandary of Race is indeed an impo rtant book not only to scholars but also to the common man in quest of intelligence racism.